SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
1 | DQF-COSY | 2mM unlabeled | 90%H2O/10%D2O or 99.996% D2O | 10mM sodium phosphate | 6.5 | ambient | 294 |
NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
1 | Bruker | DRX | 800 |
2 | Bruker | DRX | 600 |
3 | Bruker | DRX | 400 |
NMR Refinement | ||
---|---|---|
Method | Details | Software |
Distance geometry & Simulated annealing + Susceptibility anisotropy | The structures are refined using residual dipolar coupling constraints | XwinNMR |
NMR Ensemble Information | |
---|---|
Conformer Selection Criteria | The submitted conformer models are the 32 structures with lowest energy and acceptable covalent geometry |
Conformers Calculated Total Number | 200 |
Conformers Submitted Total Number | 32 |
Representative Model | 1 (major conformers(1-15)) |
Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
---|---|
Details | The structure was determined using standard 2D and 3D techniques |
Computation: NMR Software | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
# | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
1 | processing | XwinNMR | 98 | Bruker Inc. |
2 | data analysis | Sparky | 3.95 | UCSF |
3 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.1 | Brunger et al. |
4 | refinement | CNS | 1.0 | Brunger et al. |